Original Position - SEP
The SEP discussion of "Rawls' social contract account of justice". Discusses the veil of ignorance.
This concept can be thought of as a game-theoretic solution to discovering what the ethical thing to do ina context is. Two major questions can be asked in response to this idea:
- why is it the right one? What makes this a good characterisation of "morality"?
- does it work? is it the sort of thought experiment that breaks down in practice?
Brought up in the context of people to critique as a jumping off point for an attempt at a partial answer to question 2: "in many contexts, no." Source of T's joke title for the impossibility theorem I wanted to derive: Unveiling the Veil of Ignorance, or yet another reason why the veil of ingorance is full of holes. Revisit this note if we ever do a reread of (Tarnas, Richard 1993).
The SEP discussion of "Rawls' social contract account of justice". Discusses the veil of ignorance.
This concept can be thought of as a game-theoretic solution to discovering what the ethical thing to do ina context is. Two major questions can be asked in response to this idea:
- why is it the right one? What makes this a good characterisation of "morality"?
- does it work? is it the sort of thought experiment that breaks down in practice?
Brought up in the context of people to critique as a jumping off point for an attempt at a partial answer to question 2: "in many contexts, no." Source of T's joke title for the impossibility theorem I wanted to derive: Unveiling the Veil of Ignorance, or yet another reason why the veil of ingorance is full of holes. Revisit this note if we ever do a reread of (Tarnas, Richard 1993).
Refs
- Freeman (2016) Original Position, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/original-position/.
- Freeman (2016) Original Position, Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/original-position/.