Moire dancing

ID: f3ee4c16-ae4b-4dff-84e1-df84e557e53f

How expressive of a language is moire? expressivity concept. Person Do Thing is another example, one that illustrates more analytically that a big part of expressivity is embedded in the bounds of the speaker. See also Sentence by sentence annotations of (a very little bit of) Infinite Jest for an example of how sentences direct attention flow, and Stanley Fish - How to Write a Sentence (And How to Read One) for a more thorough discussion of it.

In moire dancing expressivity, you'd have to track if an effect was physically achievable, but also if the flow from effect to effect moved the attention and somatic affect in compatible ways.

Also the fact that this can ever be expected to work, even in say simple waves arising from undulation, shows that how somatic affect works is built on top of how space works.

Also the interference of how we read the affect of the performer and what visual patterns emerge would constitute the poetics of the language. See poetics of structuralism.

Does this have a relationship to tatparya?

anyway you can recover a lot of the bauhaus architectural school once you see that their essential mistake is forgetting the speakers of their language, and thereby losing all chance at dwelling-poetics; you have to gut the whole thing to pull out the useful bits, but you absolutely can. See Bauhaus building is antihumanist.

This node is a singleton!